Description:
In order to teach students, we must know where they are and monitor their progress along the way. We do this through stating objectives and then assessing whether or not students have mastered those objectives. Traditionally, we think of tests coming at the end of the teaching, but it is also important to measure throughout the teaching progress.
Analysis:
The first step teachers should take in beginning a new lesson or unit is to state the objectives. The objectives help the students understand what they are responsible for learning during the lesson. The objective should also state how students will be evaluated on the information. A objective typically follows this pattern: condition-performance-criterion (Slavin, 2012), Before teachers commit to the objectives they have set forth, a task-analysis must be done to determine what prerequisite skills are needed to be successful in learning the new material. To streamline the process and ensure that objectives align with material and come in the order that makes the most sense, teachers should implement backward planning.
Backward planning also helps teachers properly and efficiently align objectives with assessments. Savin (2012) suggests that teachers should actually write test questions before stating objectives. Objectives should measure a wide variety of knowledge, so teachers should consult Bloom’s Taxonomy when writing objectives. Using a system like Bloom’s Taxonomy prevents teachers from teaching only simple skills. Savin (2012) states, “All too often, teachers focus on measurable knowledge and comprehension objectives and forget that students cannot be considered proficient in many skills until they can apply or synthesize those skills” (p. 406). While objectives definitely benefit students, they mostly benefit teachers and help teachers stay organized and on-task. Savin (2012) states that research regarding instructional objectives “implies that instruction is effective to the degree to which objectives, teaching, and assessment are coordinated with one another” (p. 407).
After setting forth instructional objectives, teachers must then assess/evaluate students on those objectives and provide feedback to let students know how they are doing when it comes to meeting them. Evaluation refers to “all the means used in schools to formally measure student performance” and includes “quizzes and tests, written evaluations, and grades” (Slavin, 2012, p. 408). Evaluation has different purposes: feedback, information, and incentive. For students, evaluations provide students feedback on how they are doing and if they are successful in learning the material being presented—are they mastering those objectives set forth at the beginning. Evaluations also provide feedback to teachers, which allows teachers to see how effective their instruction is. Evaluations also provide information to parents and other professionals (psychologists, administrators, public officials) about how students and teachers are performing in the classroom. Evaluations also serve as incentives for students, and we all know how great it feels to earn a good grade.
There are many different types of evaluations, but they all fall in to one of two categories: summative or formative evaluations. A formative evaluation “is designed to tell teachers whether additional instruction is needed and to tell students whether additional learning is needed” while a summative evaluation “refers to tests of student knowledge at the end of instructional units” (Slavin, 2012, p. 410). There are many different types of assessments. One type of item included on many tests is a select-response item. When writing these types of questions, teachers should remember that “a capable student should be able to choose the correct answer and not be distracted by the wrong alternatives” and teachers “should minimize the chance that a student who is ignorant of the subject matter can guess the correct answer” (Slavin, 2012, p. 418). True/False and matching questions also fall into this category. Constructed-response items require a student to finish a sentence or fill in a blank. While these can be easier to write, they can be tricky because teachers may receive more ambiguous answers. Essay questions and questions that require problem-solving are also options to include on an assessment. Performance assessments and student portfolios are other ways to assess students with giving a formal assessment in one session. A portfolio compiles a students’ work over time, and a performance assessment is a test that “involve[s] actual demonstrations of knowledge or skills in real life” (Slavin, 2012, p. 432). These require a better understanding of the material, as the students must put it to use to be successful.
Assessments and evaluations must be graded, and while most schools use the typical letter scale, lots of schools are switching to other methods. Mastery grading is now seen more and more, and it typically gives students another opportunity to improve if the material isn’t mastered initially.
Reflection:
The longer I teach, the more I understand just how important learning objectives are for both my students and for me. Outlining the objectives I want students to meet before I start planning an assessment or lesson really helps me put the goals of a unit into focus. Though Slavin suggests that assessments should be made before objectives, I typically come up with a rough draft of the objectives, make the assessment, and then go back and revise my objectives to meet the assessment. Like objectives, assessments are equally as important, and it is important that teachers give different types of assessments. I admit, I didn’t use formative assessments as much as I should have when I first started teaching, but each year I incorporate them more and more. Sometimes, it is really just thinking of something in terms of an assessment and taking good notes about what students do and do not understand to help with planning for the next lesson.
Developing evaluations is becoming more and more difficult to me as we try so hard to align our assessments at the school level with the assessments the state is providing. It is also becoming increasingly difficult to keep kids honest. It sometimes seem like technology is a teacher’s best friend and worst enemy. With multiple choice tests, it is almost impossible to keep students from cheating, even if it is just making an extra copy of the answers and providing them to a student in the next period class. Even when I give performance assessments, I often feel that students are using the Internet to find too much information rather than relying on their own knowledge. Lately, I’ve resorted a lot of essay writing for assessments, and I often make them in-class essays to ensure that students can’t access information online to assist them. While students often complain about writing essays, there are a lot of benefits. One thing is that students can draw on lots of different information to develop an answer, and there isn’t just one correct answer. Additionally, students can utilize other skills and/or knowledge to help answer the question, and they are also improving their writing skills. When writing an essay, I always let students revise, because that is part of the process. In a study on writing and feedback, it was found that students are more successful when they provide peer feedback on one’s writing and use that feedback to improve. Wakefield, et. al. (2014) refer to the idea that “the mere act of re-reading and re-writing one’s own paper usually results in at least some improvement” (p. 259). In contrast, students are never able to re-work answers on a multiple choice test. For me, writing just aligns better to my teaching style, and so I utilize it most. We are trying to make progress and continue to improve, and I appreciate that writing allows students to improve no matter where they start.
References:
Slavin, R.E. Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice (10th ed.). Boston: MA, Pearson.
Wakefield, C., Adie, J., Pitt, E., & Owens, T. (2014). Feeding forward from summative assessment: the Essay Feedback Checklist as a learning tool. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 39(2), 253-262. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.822845